2007-07-22:
[4:46] <jsp> ok, well at least it only took me 20 min to redo my users thing to use the helma stuff correctly[4:47] <jsp> thanks again for the pointer[4:48] <jsp> have you done anything with building a more sophisticated user authentication atop Helma's users? e.g., don't store the passwords in plain text, provide cookie tokens to automatically login if desired, etc.?[19:59] <rjb_> re[19:59] <rjb_> any of you guys have an opinion on phobos?[20:00] <rjb_> https://phobos.dev.java.net/[20:02] <zumbrunn> from what I've seen it looks rather code-in-template centric[20:02] <zumbrunn> as opposed to "rails-ish"[20:03] <zumbrunn> but I think it is good for "javascript on the server-side" that it exists[20:04] <zumbrunn> how well do you know it, rjb_?[20:04] <rjb_> not at all[20:05] <rjb_> i just learned of its existence[20:09] <jsp> looks like too heavy on the heavy java stuff. and I don't really trust the sun folks to do something actually dynamic[20:10] <rjb_> they want you to use netbeans for even the simplest tutorial example[20:10] <jsp> yeah. that's the sort of thing I mean[20:11] <rjb_> puts me off a little[20:12] <jsp> and javascript is actually extraordinarily difficult to do a good IDE for, so I think these are in descending order of likeliness: "the IDE is important b/c you have to do lots of boiler-plate garbage as is common in Java" "the IDE helps if you use JavaScript in the suggested limited way" and "they've actually written a good javascript IDE"[20:14] <zumbrunn> you forgot the most likely one: "the IDE helps if you want to avoid actually writing any Javascript" ;-)[20:14] <jsp> heh[20:14] <jsp> if you do try it, let us know. gtg for now myself[21:14] <rjb_> well i don't think i'll be actually trying it, was just curious[22:41] <rjb> what i definitely do plan to play with though is the h2 database[23:55] <rjb> yay, henplus (http://henplus.sourceforge.net/) works very nicely with h2
In the channel now:
Logs by date: