2008-05-26:
[14:23] <zumbrunn> hi Ace_NoOne[14:23] <Ace_NoOne> hi there[14:23] <Ace_NoOne> remember me, with the licensing question?[14:23] <zumbrunn> I saw you question about the license[14:24] <Ace_NoOne> ahh cool[14:24] <Ace_NoOne> what's the verdict[14:25] <zumbrunn> I didn't write that code, so it isn't really for me to say[14:25] <zumbrunn> I can only give you a general recommendation[14:25] <zumbrunn> and that would be to always retain the original copyright and license information[14:26] <zumbrunn> as long as it is possible to keep the original code separate from your code[14:27] <Ace_NoOne> well, I'm modifying the function anyway - brb[14:28] <zumbrunn> and when that becomes unreasonable, to still mention that it was based on the original work "foo" that was licensed under license "bar"[14:29] <zumbrunn> of course, this is a bit silly if the code you are copying is trivial[14:30] <zumbrunn> but only the copyright holder (or a judge) can decide what is trivial and what isn't[14:34] <Ace_NoOne> it is indeed trivial - just this line: this.setMinutes(this.getMinutes() + this.getTimezoneOffset());[14:34] <Ace_NoOne> however, I do get your point - do you know who wrote that code?[14:35] <zumbrunn> that's trivial indeed[14:35] <zumbrunn> ...in my opionion ;-)[14:35] <zumbrunn> opinion[14:36] <Ace_NoOne> hehe[14:36] <zumbrunn> not sure[14:36] <zumbrunn> maybe tobi, or someone else at the orf[14:41] <Ace_NoOne> orf?[14:42] <zumbrunn> the austrian broadcasting corporation[14:42] <zumbrunn> http://orf.at/[14:43] <Ace_NoOne> ahh, ORF[14:43] <zumbrunn> right ;-)
In the channel now:
Logs by date: