2008-08-14:
[13:40] <midnightmonster> zumbrunn, (and anyone else) did you see the news about ecmascript?[13:41] <zumbrunn> I guess I didn't[13:41] <zumbrunn> ?[13:41] <midnightmonster> big, big news, summarized by the man himself: https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es4-discuss/2008-August/003400.html[13:43] <zumbrunn> oh, I've seen that[13:43] <zumbrunn> but didn't have time to read it yet[13:43] <zumbrunn> so, didn't realize yet that it's big news :-)[13:44] <zumbrunn> ok, I see[13:45] <zumbrunn> with that, the roadmap Brendan mentioned in recent interviews makes more sense[13:45] <midnightmonster> ? would have to be very recent interviews, I think, since this is only <1 week old?[13:46] <zumbrunn> maybe he already thought/hoped this would be the outcome of Oslo[13:47] <zumbrunn> I'll have to read it later in more detail...[13:47] <zumbrunn> gotta run right now[13:47] <zumbrunn> bbl[13:48] <midnightmonster> I tentatively backed es4-the-previous b/c that was the camp Brendan was in (and I trust him with the language's evolution much more than I would Crockford or MS), but I'm happy to see the various interests coming together on something that one the face seems a lot more appealing to me.[15:38] <zumbrunn> midnightmonster: dito, here[15:41] <hzin> hi, just wondering, how usable is Helma NG now?[15:42] <zumbrunn> (as long as the committee isn't falling in a MS trap to delay the evolution of the language)[15:43] <zumbrunn> hzin: define "usable" ;-)[15:43] <zumbrunn> I would say it's perfectly usable[15:43] <zumbrunn> I'm using it for production projects already[15:43] <hzin> cool[15:43] <zumbrunn> but I am the venturous type[15:44] <zumbrunn> officially, it is alpha[15:44] <midnightmonster> I have not seriously considered using it for production apps[15:44] <midnightmonster> (which mostly means using it at all, since I don't have time to play much)[15:44] <zumbrunn> that's reasonable[15:44] <hzin> I would like to spend sometime looking at the source code, mainly to see how a js web framework work, should I start with Helma 1.6 or NG?[15:45] <zumbrunn> which source code?[15:45] <zumbrunn> java or js?[15:45] <hzin> java[15:45] <zumbrunn> (the framework or apps)[15:45] <hzin> framework[15:45] <zumbrunn> I would suggest you look at helma-ng[15:46] <hzin> looks like helma-ng has significantly less java[15:47] <hzin> how complete is ng feature wise[15:47] <hzin> I know ORM is not there yet[15:47] <zumbrunn> there is the hibernate-ng code[15:47] <hzin> oh ok[15:52] <midnightmonster> zumbrunn, re: MS, that is a real worry, but I think Brendan's wise to them. and a united-ish committee will probably do at least some good things faster than a very divided one.[15:52] <zumbrunn> yep[15:52] <zumbrunn> namespaces being dropped from ES4 means that the module scopes in helma-ng become an even more interesting concept[16:23] <midnightmonster> zumbrunn, is there a default file object store? still XML or JSON or ?[16:24] <midnightmonster> would be very interesting, I think, to try hooking 10gen's mongo distributed db[16:24] <zumbrunn> storage.js, yes, json[16:24] <zumbrunn> yes, it would be![16:25] <zumbrunn> you've spent some time looking into the 10gen stuff, right?[16:31] <midnightmonster> some, yeah[16:32] <midnightmonster> trolling the docs a bit and downloaded it but haven't run anything but hello world[18:15] <midnightmonster> they seem to have some good template stuff, I just don't want to go back to templates at all
In the channel now:
Logs by date: